Why does it seem strange? How can you really prove something that happened over a year ago (apart from youtube) and especially the fact that events over 6 month ago are not shown on your profile.

Well, obviously loads of people will of tried to beat that time, and failed...so it's common sense that it's very hard to beat, even you the king of funkysnooker hasn't been able to do it.

What people have to remember is when you are recording the timer doesn't stop at all, where as in normal play the time stops after every shot while the balls are still moving, so if bud did get a 107 in under 2 mins, if that was been recorded then it would of been a lot longer.

Hope that makes sense!

Arpeggi got a 147 in orig in a 5 second game.

Why is it obvious? I think very few people are actually bothered.

Well I haven't tried as arcade is a poor mans game in my opinion.

People won't be bothered now cause the thread is a year old, but by the looks of it loads of people were trying to beat it at the time, even budweiser said he was going to have a go!

its not all about speed unless faced with 5/10sec clock and even then thats more than enough time for me the game is more about break building in snooker so your opponent doesnt come back to table... with me 1 visit and clear

True but this was over a year ago when the game was much easier, im sure if t1nie_tempah tried, he could do the same...

Tinie is good, but james was a lot better. I'm sure Destiny has done a 00:00, he used his robot stare to freeze the clock...

PAHAHAHAAHA

batterys not included adam

iv had two within 4 minues of each other like that,

There was a big discussion a while ago, on the thread I linked before. We came to the conclusion that the fastest anyone could do it was probably 2.30
We did this to prove that ste_efc had massively lied about hitting a max in 90 secs....

WHOORYOU?

Ummm no i didnt, i got a 131 on 5 seconds though

so ken, get your facts right

DOM????

Hah! Sorry mate your always a different name!

131 mate it was no 147 that would be too class!

Check my events - i did 2 arcade maxes in 22 mins on 05/12/11 and i know i had done each one in less than 3 mins, 26 balls for a max in 26 shots on a 5 sec counter, doing each shot in 4 secs or less means i did both in 1 min 44 secs (was more like 1min 53 secs) - guess i got a good record their and that was for two of them.

hot_stuff = Quicker than tinie

LOL

:)

In the sack

lol hot_stuff, you're forgetting the time it takes for the balls to stop rolling until the next shot starts. In a 5-sec game, you'll usually still take more than 5 seconds per shot because of that.

Impossible unless you use duracell recharables